Search for: All records

The resilience of coral reefs in oligotrophic, (sub)tropical oceans is largely due to the symbiotic relationship between scleractinian corals and Symbiodiniaceae algae, which enables efficient internal nutrient recycling. Investigating the history of this coral symbiosis can provide insights into its role in sustaining the health of both present and future coral reefs. The isotopic composition of organic nitrogen (¹⁵N/¹⁴N or δ¹⁵N) bound within coral skeletons has been utilized to trace the existence of symbiosis in fossil corals, suggesting that coral symbiosis dates back to at least 210 million years ago. The basis of this proxy is that symbiotic corals are expected to exhibit lower δ¹⁵N compared to their non-symbiotic (aposymbiotic) counterparts within the same environments, owing to internal nitrogen recycling between the coral host and algal symbiont, and reduced leakage of low-δ¹⁵N ammonium into seawater. However, this hypothesis has not been adequately tested in contemporary settings. In a laboratory experiment, we examined the δ¹⁵N differences between the symbiotic and aposymbiotic branches within the same genetic backgrounds of the facultatively symbiotic coralOculina arbusculaunder well-fed conditions. Across five different genotypes in two separate experiments, symbiotic branches consistently showed lower δ¹⁵N than their aposymbiotic counterparts. These findings corroborate the use of δ¹⁵N as a proxy for identifying coral symbiosis in the past, particularly when multiple species of corals coexisted in the same environments. 

Heterotrophy has been shown to mitigate coral–algal dysbiosis (coral bleaching) under heat challenge, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain largely unexplored. Here, we quantified coral physiology and gene expression of fragments from 13 genotypes of symbiotic Oculina arbuscula after a 28-d feeding experiment under (1) fed, ambient (24 °C); (2) unfed, ambient; (3) fed, heated (ramp to 33 °C); and (4) unfed, heated treatments. We monitored algal photosynthetic efficiency throughout the experiment, and after 28 d, profiled coral and algal carbohydrate and protein reserves, coral gene expression, algal cell densities, and chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-c2 pigments. Contrary to previous findings, heterotrophy did little to mitigate the impacts of temperature, and we observed few significant differences in physiology between fed and unfed corals under heat challenge. Our results suggest the duration and intensity of starvation and thermal challenge play meaningful roles in coral energetics and stress response; future work exploring these thresholds and how they may impact coral responses under changing climate is urgently needed. Gene expression patterns under heat challenge in fed and unfed corals showed gene ontology enrichment patterns consistent with classic signatures of the environmental stress response. While gene expression differences between fed and unfed corals under heat challenge were subtle: Unfed, heated corals uniquely upregulated genes associated with cell cycle functions, an indication that starvation may induce the previously described, milder “type B” coral stress response. Future studies interested in disentangling the influence of heterotrophy on coral bleaching would benefit from leveraging the facultative species studied here, but using the coral in its symbiotic and aposymbiotic states.